Why is NASPA creating issue guides for deliberative dialogue?
In recent years, higher education institutions have seen dramatic increases in polarization on campus. Democratic deliberation is an important civic literacy skill with have applications across institutions of higher education, including in classrooms and student organizations. Participants in deliberative dialogue forums practice approaches to building understanding across differences and developing a shared, or common, purpose. The skills and model of deliberative dialogue translate to a variety of “wicked problems” that campus communities face.
What issues will NASPA create issue guides about?
NASPA has created issue guides on Free Speech and Fraternity and Sorority Life, and is in the process of creating a third guide on the Institution's Role in Addressing Racial Inequity.
How long does it take to create an issue guide?
The work for each guide takes about a year, though this sometimes depends based on the subject matter.
What is the full process for creating an issue guide?
The NASPA Issue Guides are created by a core planning team consisting of NASPA staff and members which works together to engage in community-based research and development of each guide. The team will:
-
Lead a variety of concern gathering sessions, some held in-person at NASPA events and some held virtually.
-
Process and distill the resulting data at a 2-day in-person team meeting.
-
Write the guide in the model established by the National Issues Forum.
-
Test the guide at a pilot test session held at a NASPA event and at pilot test deliberations on campuses.
What is “concern gathering”?
Concern gathering is a term used by the Kettering Foundation to describe a process for naming and framing issues that exist in communities where there isn’t a clear “right” answer or direction. It’s the first step in developing an issue guide and designed to be a way of surfacing and collecting the voices of those across the community (in our case, the broader community of student affairs professionals) about a particular topic.
Who should participate in concern gathering?
In order to hear from as many student affairs professionals as possible, NASPA will hold at least six concern gathering sessions for each issue guide. Many of these sessions will be held virtually so that we can hear from those who aren’t able to travel to one of our conferences. The intent is to hear not only from those professionals who are working directly with a given topic or issue but also those in other areas across campus or even at campuses who don’t have strong involvement with a given topic or issue but have thoughts about their role in higher education spaces in general.
Is concern gathering about airing grievances?
No. The format for concern gathering is broad-based – we’re not looking specifically for negative aspects related to a given topic or issue, but also where people see how some of the opportunities around a topic or issue on campus and within students experiences that may not be getting the attention they deserve. Depending on the conversations that come up during concern gathering, we may, for instance, end up focusing an issue guide on how campuses can best promote and expand those positive contributions in the face of some of the more “headline grabbing” incidents. We won’t know for sure what the focus of the guide will be until we hear from the community during the sessions, though, so it’s hard at the start to be more specific.
What happens after the concern gathering sessions?
Following the concern gathering phase, the issue guide team will meet to begin identifying issues and values that surfaced during these sessions. They will review all the notes and try to group concerns by a core underlying value that seems to be expressed by the concern. By focusing on the underlying values, the team will be better able to identify possible options for future forum participants to consider, along with their attendant benefits and trade-offs. Our ultimate goal is to create an issue guide around this topic to assist colleagues in navigating conversations around these issues on their own campus.